Repairing Things Made Easy Through Electric Drills

Tools are necessary to be able to perform the task at hand. Each tool serves a certain purpose. One has to know what specific tool is needed so as not to create further damage. Whether it is for building a house or simply repairing certain things, these tools can come in handy.

Houses are prone to repairs and it is but right that the tools needed are available in one’s home so as to make the necessary repairs in time. Basic tools like hammer, saw, and drills are needed in constructing and repairing things at the same time. Construction material companies have made the essential adjustments to cater to the growing demand of people who wish to do certain things on their own like building partitions in the house or repairing an area in one’s home. A lot of DIY (do-it-yourself) tools are available.

A drill is one essential tool that should be present in one’s home. These drills are used to make the necessary holes without creating too much mess on the walls. There are drills that can be operated manually or electrically though in the recent years it was electric drills that have dominated the construction arena.

There are different types of drills depending on where it is needed. Here is a rundown of some of these drills.

Hand Drill – It uses a hand-operated handle to turn the gear to be able to make the desired hole.

Breast Drill – This is basically the same as the hand drill, only larger and it has a plate to apply the needed pressure for a more accurate result.

Push Drill – It uses repetitive pushing motion in making pilot holes.

Electric Rotary Drill – The most common among all the drills that are available in the market today. This can be used for different materials. It has a corded version and a cordless battery operated version as well.

It is not surprising that more people opt to buy the cordless drill. Some of its features include:

· It is much safer because there is no cord attached in the drill therefore one does not have to worry where it needs to be plugged.
· It is lightweight. Because of this, the drill becomes easier to handle and less pressure is needed in supporting the tool.
· Batteries are rechargeable. Through this, batteries can be changed anytime and anywhere as long as there are battery reserves.
· It offers versatility. Because of this feature, hard to reach areas in one’s home can be accessed through the use of the cordless drill.

So, when buying an electric drill for the first time, be sure to incorporate these pointers to be able to make the right choice.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/6459474

Doctor Uses Electric Drill

A electric drill with slow rotation speed is composed of a shell, a drill bit holder, a drive unit and an electric motor for driving said drill bit holder via said drive unit. Said drive unit is an N-stage gear-type speed reducer, which features hat the mutually engaged big and small gears in each stage are coaxial.

1. The medical electric drill machine should be battery operated.

2. The drill should be capable of autoclaving and should be quoted with the autoclavable box.

3. Should have high torque for drilling in small bones. Rpm min 900, with minicoupling 3000approx.

4. It should be Light, handy and versatile Variable speed with oscillating drilling.

5. Durable and powerful batteries Easy to use, highly functional attachments or power adapter Microprocessor controlled universal battery charger

6. Various attachments should be quick coupling.

7. The catch of the drill bits should be friction lock.

8. There should be attachment for the saw blade fixing.

9. Should be upgradeable to electric console attachment.

10. There should be oscillating drill mode for soft tissue protection.

A medical electric drill is used in medical treatment, for example a British doctor uses for an emergency surgery on a woman in the Ukraine.

Article Source: http://EzineArticles.com/1196567

Brutal honesty has found its place

Recently, I took part in a robust IABC Africa panel debate in Cape Town on communicator readiness for 2020. The thing about discussions like these is that if they are facilitated well, they can spark discussion that sets the tone for the entire conference.
Brutal honesty has found its place
©hatza via 123RF
And ignite unbridled dialogue under the steermanship of director of the IABC International executive board, Daniel Munslow, it certainly did, running well over the conference’s tight schedule.

There is no doubt that demands on communicators are changing now more than ever, and panellists Mia Azam, Woolworths financial services senior communications manager, Sappi’s group head of corporate affairs, Andre Oberholzer, and 2016/2017 chairman of the IABC’s International Executive Board, Dianne Chase, all put forward sound arguments for remaining future fit as the needs of businesses evolve.

But to my mind, the more things change, the more they stay the same – with perhaps one small difference: When your audience ‘pays’ you with their time, it has become even more critical now than ever before to get your message across as quickly and efficiently as possible. The future is about communicating real-time decisions rapidly.

The 24-hour news cycle and the lack of historical perspective has made us all dangerously impatient. Rapid technological disruption, the rebalance of world power, and continuing economic uncertainty, all combine to create highly volatile and increasingly complex messages.

Making this powder keg even more unstable is that communicators need to drill through huge volumes of information and translate issues into easy to understand terms. Our interactions need to break through the clutter and present messages that are compellingly succinct.

What is also fast disappearing – at last – are the communication silos of old and, along with them, the tired necessity of having meetings upon meetings which, more often than not, result in nothing at all.

To the Twitter generation, a week feels like an age. A CEO shares the stage today with much younger and often self-taught opinion makers who, for the most part, have developed a knack for getting their message across in news their audience can use.

Simply put, if you’re not on the bus, it will leave you behind at the station. The holy grail of deadline has never been more sacred.

I work with leaders across a range of business sectors and believe that they rarely have had a more challenging time. It’s not enough to be an executive with stellar credentials who is sorely lacking in effective and efficient communication skills.

In order to remain relevant, it is absolutely critical for executives to adopt an agile approach in their communications. It’s all about reducing complex messaging into short and powerful soundbytes.

So, if I had to offer my clients some advice, I would tell them to broaden their circle. They need to find straight shooters who tell them what they need to hear – not what they want to hear.

Brutal honesty has, at last, found a very real and important place.

President Trump could kill the Paris Agreement – but climate action will survive

November 9 will likely become the day that the Paris Agreement died, but not when the goal of limiting warming to 2? slipped out of reach.
President Trump could kill the Paris Agreement – but climate action will survive
© trashthelens – 123RF.com
President Donald Trump can, and likely will, drop out of the Paris climate agreement. Direct withdrawal will take four years.

But Trump could instead drop out from the overall climate convention under which the agreement operates. That would only take one year and would result in automatic withdrawal from the Paris Agreement.

It would shortcut any hopes that Paris would bind Trump’s hands for some time.

As I’ve argued in my research, a US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement would be its death knell.

A predictable loose cannon

Trump has also promised a range of further destructive international and domestic actions on climate and energy. These include cutting all international climate financing, rescinding energy regulations, reopening federal and offshore areas for coal and oil development and abolishing the clean power plan.

There is some hope that Trump is a loose cannon who may renege on his previous promises. Such hope is ultimately false. Trump has already appointed noted climate denier Myron Ebell as the head of his Environmental Protection Agency transition team.

More importantly, the Republican establishment supports this approach to climate policy. The agreed Republican platform of July rejects the Paris Agreement and calls for it to be submitted to the Senate (where it would be defeated) as well as an end of all funding to the UN climate convention. Their domestic policies are best summarised as “drill, baby, drill!”

It is foolish to believe that Trump would oppose his own party, and many of the voters of the US “rust belt” whose support he relied on, in an attempt to save the Paris Agreement.

Trump may be unpredictable in some regards, but his approach to climate change is not.

Counting the losses

Trump’s climate policy would lead to the US overshooting its already inadequate 2030 climate targets. The US needs additional measures on top of the Clean Power Plan to meet the targets established by Obama.

The US withdrawing from the Paris Agreement, or blatantly missing its climate targets, could be near fatal for a deal which relies on global ambition. The Paris Agreement relies on two things: increasing ambition through peer pressure, and a signal to markets and the public.

Both peer pressure and the signal will be shredded by a rogue, Trump-led United States.

States will be unlikely to feel pressured if the world’s second largest greenhouse emitter is polluting unabated. The effects of US recalcitrance were all too clear in the case of the Kyoto Protocol, which the United States simply refused to ratify. Trust would be undermined and excuses for inaction amplified if the US abandons international efforts again.

Any signal that existed from the framework of Paris would be largely extinguished. Already fossil fuels stocks have surged post-election despite a downturn in the rest of the market. Renewable energy share prices have plummeted. The idea of the signal hinged on broad participation creating investor confidence in international law. US withdrawal and the breaking of commitments will shatter any belief that investors may have had in Paris.

The Paris Agreement sacrificed binding emissions cuts and finance in order to ensure US participation. The few benefits it had were derived from broad participation, including from the United States. Such benefits will be lost by a US dropout.

Paris will likely survive as a structure. Countries will continue with the global show-and-tell, trading unbinding pledges every five years for some time to come. It will go on, but it will cease to be a large source of hope or change.

Opportunities for the future

A Trump presidency will also create opportunities for renewed action internationally.

Trump promises to usher in an age of protectionism, scrapping free trade agreements such as the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) and North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). He has vowed to brand major trading partners such as China as “currency manipulators”.

At the same time nationalism and discontent with free trade have surged in Europe. China has scaled up its domestic renewable energy and climate policies and is looking to formally establish a national emissions trading scheme next year.

Both a protectionist Trump administration that has dropped out of Paris and trends in the European Union and China could bring the idea of climate trade measures back to the table.

The Paris Agreement could be amended to use trade measures against countries who are not part of the deal. Such a move could not be adopted until the next conference in November 2017. Amending the agreement would only require a three-quarters majority vote, but is still unlikely to garner the support to be adopted under the painfully slow and convoluted UN process.

Climate trade measures from the EU and or China are much more likely. The EU may be pushed by Trump’s trade policies towards imposing a carbon price on imports (carbon border tax adjustments) from the US and others. China may consider a similar move. The two could even act in tandem, creating their own bilateral climate club outside of the Paris Agreement. Such material penalties would likely force the US to eventually shift and reengage with international efforts.

Such an outcome seems unlikely for now, particularly in the politically paralysed Europe. But Trump at least opens the opportunity for such change.

The much maligned Trump will supercharge climate civil disobedience in both the US and around the globe.

The world’s best chance of avoiding dangerous global warming are a climate trade war and rampant climate disobedience.

Such actions will be more beneficial for the climate than the current Paris Agreement ever could have been. The incremental and baseless pledge and review of Paris Agreement would have never been enough to trigger the herculean transition needed.

The 2016 US election will almost certainly become the epitaph for the success of the Paris climate agreement. But it does not mean that 2℃ is necessarily out of reach; the future may not depend on the actions of an ageing superpower.

A green path to industrialisation

For environmentalists and development experts, green is not just a colour, it also refers to activities that benefit the environment – the careful use of the earth’s finite resources.
A green path to industrialisation
© wirapong samlee – 123RF.com
Africa’s policy wonks are already on the green bandwagon, having identified “green industrialisation” as the Holy Grail of the continent’s socioeconomic transformation. They believe infusing green initiatives into value-chain activities — during the sourcing and processing of raw materials, and the marketing and selling of finished products to customers — can cure economic stagnation.

At recent economic forums in N’Djamena in Chad, Addis Ababa in Ethiopia, Abuja in Nigeria, Rabat in Morocco, even New York in the United States, and elsewhere, Africa’s experts have been expressing their support for green industrialisation.

“Green industrialisation is the only way for Africa … it is a precondition for sustainnable and inclusive growth,” highlights the Economic Report on Africa 2016: Greening Africa’s Industrialisation, published by the United Nations Economic Commission for Africa (ECA).

Green initiatives will move Africa from the periphery to the centre of the global economy, said Fatima Denton, director of the ECA’s Special Initiatives Division, during the African Development Week in Addis Ababa, in April.

Africa’s green industrialisation advocates have borrowed from the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) adopted by world leaders in September 2015, and the Paris Climate Change Agreement of December 2015 — both promote green initiatives.

Given that energy production and use contribute up to 87% of overall carbon dioxide emissions generated by humans, curtailing the exploitation of fossil fuels is at the centre of green advocacy. The burning of fossil fuels like oil, coal and natural gas generates carbon dioxide, methane and water vapour, which in turn contribute to global warming.

However, it may be tough to sell Africa’s oil and natural gas exporters, like Angola and Nigeria, on limiting fossil fuel drilling. For both countries, oil accounts for more than 90% of exports and at least two-thirds of the national budget. The price of oil dropped from a peak of $100 a barrel in 2015 to about $50 by mid-June 2016. Before the oil price crash, even countries just discovering oil — like Ghana, Liberia and Sierra Leone — had anticipated a financial windfall from the sector.

These countries fear that limiting fossil fuel investments may severely damage their economies, although green advocates continue to insist that renewable energy, including energy generated by sun, wind, rain, waves and geothermal heat, all of which Africa has in abundance, is the way to go.

African countries must take advantage of “new innovations, technologies and business models that use natural resources optimally and efficiently”, notes the 2016 ECA economic report.

Kandeh Yumkella, who formerly held the title of special representative of the UN secretary-general for Sustainable Energy for All (a global initiative), offered a middle-of-the-road approach, recommending that Africa adopt an all-of-the-above energy strategy. “Why should we burn gas? Why shouldn’t we use gas for energy production?” Yumkella asked rhetorically, in an interview with Africa Renewal.

Retailers must pressure manufacturers to stop insulting SA consumers

It is fascinating watching South African consumers slowly but surely casting aside their apathy and demanding good quality and service. One hopes that business is keeping an eye on this transformation because, given the vagaries of consumerism, things don’t happen slowly but surely, they change overnight and suddenly, all that cutting of corners that errant shops and service providers thought they were getting away with, leap out and bite them on the bum.
Of course, there are still far too many things happening here in SA that wouldn’t be tolerated in most other countries.

Devil in the detail

Products and services that are a reminder that sustainable customer retention and satisfaction are entirely dependent on those often overlooked little details rather than big bang advertising and publicity campaigns.

A good example of this detail is the number of imported consumer electronic and electrical products that are sold in SA with those ill-fitting little two-pin European plugs.

Now, these are not just little things like toasters and electric drills but include some very expensive TV sets, sewing machines, home movie systems, dishwashers and the like.

Diabolical two pin plugs

And, while it makes sense to have a two-pin plug on something like a cellphone charger, hair dryer, or razor one might take on overseas trips, it is hugely inconvenient when importers flog the bigger stuff with flimsy plugs that you can’t cut off and replace with our big, bulky three-pin equivalents because it voids warranties and you are left having to spend anything from R12.00 to R25.00 on adapters that never seem to last and which can be downright dangerous.

It’s actually extremely insulting when you think about it, because in effect, companies overseas are saying, “Let’s flog this stuff to South Africa, but frankly they’re not important enough for us to fit their stupid plugs.”

For some importers and distributors this has already created a marketing problem but, for most, consumer apathy continues to allow them to get away with it.

But, as consumerism grows, more and more ordinary South Africans will do as I do and refuse point blank to buy any imported gadget or appliance that hasn’t got our plug on it.

That’s the thing about marketing – if you have no respect or consideration for your customers you won’t keep them very long. Sooner or later they cotton to your cutting corners.